I enjoy reading the blog of Cathy Davidson. She pushes my thinking in ways I don’t always anticipate. In a recent blog post, she suggests some ways in which she and her students are already engaging in peer review (e.g., commenting on blogs) while sharing with them that peer review matters.
I like her ideas … and yet am simultaneously working on this eBook project where we will publish all voices (with the exception that works that throw flames, point fingers, or rake muck are not welcome). No formal peer review beyond that. And we did this purposely, because we felt that editorial or peer review might intimidate some from participating or — worse — make potential authors feel that there was a “right” answer.
So … when is peer review necessary in the digital world? And when is it OK to let it go?
Particularly, sildenafil citrate lives up to expectations by repressing amerikabulteni.com cheapest cialis a chemical in the springy erectile tissue of the penis, which prompts an expanded blood supply to the penis during erection). Since most of us don’t exercise continually the glucose gets stored as fat. discover for more info 5mg cialis generic cialis no prescription uk Discussing this issue with your physician is essential to find the cause of pain and swelling. Christopher Snape – Lighting Designer sets cialis in uk online the atmosphere for unforgettable.