cc licensed ( BY ) flickr photo shared by woodleywonderworks
From Brian Croxall’s “Ubiquitous Librarian” blog:
Last week I heard Siva Vaidhyanathan speak about the googleization of everything … Something Siva said though really stuck with me. This is totally paraphrasing but it goes like this:
thought about this viagra sale without prescription The medications works as inhibitor to PDE5 enzyme, which make blood flow less to penile organ. Of all types impotencies in men, the major one is the inability to maintain erection which is a subsequent ronaldgreenwaldmd.com levitra generika case due to the process of sex. The product is loaded with essential salts and other viagra 100 mg ingredients which are beneficial for body. It viagra prescription ronaldgreenwaldmd.com not only affects the man physically but also affects his personal life. The digital divide was initially about the have and have-nots related to web and technology access. That is shifting— now the divide is about those who understand the data being collected and who know how to manipulate that system vs. those who are unaware of this process and who are simply objects being used.
How are we preparing librarians for a world of data and, in particular, a world of Big Data, with data sets so large they cannot be manipulated in a timely manner without digital intervention?
Perhaps more importantly, how are we preparing students to be savvier users of data?
And, when we talk about data and Big Data, how much are we privileging (or, perhaps, are we privileging?) quantitative information over qualitative?