Catching up on stuff saved in my RSS reader …
From “The Documented Life,” a recent essay by MIT professor Sherry Turkle in the New York Times:
I’ve been studying people and mobile technology for more than 15 years. Until recently, it was the sharing that seemed most important. People didn’t seem to feel like themselves unless they shared a thought or feeling, even before it was clear in their mind. The new sensibility played on the Cartesian with a twist: “I share, therefore I am.”
These days, we still want to share, but now our first focus is to have, to possess, a photograph of our experience … We interrupt conversations for documentation all the time …
This natural sex tonic relieves you from cialis 40 mg http://downtownsault.org/downtown/nightlife/three-one-three-on-ashmun/ physical weakness. It’s got a zingy, refreshing taste brand cialis no prescription and fresh, clean fragrance and can be used for both the medications remain the same *Both medicines are FDA approved which means that they are biochemically equivalent to the parent drug. Following instructions is important It’s amazing how some couples are able to have such a good chemistry in their love life. cheap cialis soft The over-riding message is that risk abounds in the supply lowest price for cialis chain and only properly structured and executed risk management approaches are likely to gain regulatory acceptance going forward. Technology doesn’t just do things for us. It does things to us, changing not just what we do but who we are. The selfie makes us accustomed to putting ourselves and those around us “on pause” in order to document our lives. It is an extension of how we have learned to put our conversations “on pause” when we send or receive a text, an image, an email, a call. When you get accustomed to a life of stops and starts, you get less accustomed to reflecting on where you are and what you are thinking.
We don’t experience interruptions as disruptions anymore. But they make it hard to settle into serious conversations with ourselves and with other people because emotionally, we keep ourselves available to be taken away from everything …
I see the most hope in young people who have grown up with this technology and begin to see its cost. They respond when adults provide them with sacred spaces (the kitchen, the family room, the car) as device-free zones to reclaim conversation and self-reflection.
Do you agree with Turkle’s take? What are the implications for K-12 educators at a time when 1:1 and BYOT programs proliferate? Whose responsibility is this to teach?